Talk:Conrad Slater

From Chewiki: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I didn't write this page but i DID add the picture XD --conradslater 13:20, 14 August 2007 (PDT)

lol, what the hell? XD Steg 13:25, 14 August 2007 (PDT)

Holy crap XD--BigMarioandTailsfan 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT)


I feel that this is unworthy of a nomination, due to bad grammar spread throughout. If the grammar and writing were to be improved, I would accept its nomination, on the grounds that it is otherwise well written. It has a sufficient amount of information, and has a wee bit of humour.

And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -Yoshit 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT)

It really shouldn't be featured just because of notability. It's not a role-model article, so I'm against it. --NinjaCoachZ 17:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
All right, I fixed that grammar issues that "Sonrad Clator" did.
Kinghomer45 is not a role-model type of YouTube Pooper, and yet we still allowed him in. Besides, why not feature the guy who originally created this website in the first place? - Crazy Luigi 18:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
Kinghomer the person isn't a role-model (at all), but the article was well-written and the stuff he did was memorable. This article could use a lot more information. Just because he created the website doesn't give Conrad a free pass. --NinjaCoachZ 18:49, 11 July 2010 (CDT)